MENGUKUR KONTRIBUSI LANGGANAN E-JOURNAL SCIENCEDIRECT TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS PERGURUAN TINGGI MENGGUNAKAN STUDI BIBLIOMETRIK: STUDI KASUS UNIVERSITAS ANDALAS

Andi Saputra

Abstract


This study aims to measure the level of productivity of authors affiliated with Andalas University in journal published by ScienceDirect, to illustrate the level of contribution and utilization rate of e-journal subscriptions at Andalas University. Descriptive bibliometric method is used to measure the researcher's performance. Data is retrieved over the last 10 years. Data collection techniques from the ScienceDirect use advanced search facilities, typing the "universitas andalas" and "andalas university" keywords in the search field for the affiliation category specific to the Journal article type. Author productivity is measured using descriptive statistical methods presented based on geographic (faculty), time period (year), publisher, author and collaboration pattern, and field of science. The results of this study indicate that although in the last 10 years, numbers of Andalas University publications in ScienceDirect trend tends to increase but in terms of the number is still small, only an average of 10 articles a year. The authorship collaboration pattern reached 0,82 with the number of collaborations with outside authors reaching 78%. Distribution of users is also not evenly distributed. Only two faculties have the most benefits of ScienceDirect, Faculty of Engineering and FMIPA.


Keywords


Bibliometric; Journal; ScienceDirect; Article; Author; Access; Universitas Andalas

Full Text:

PDF

References


Glänzel, Wolfgang, & Urs Schoepflin. 1999. A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences. Parts of This Study Have Been Presented at the 5th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Held in River Forest, Illinois, June 7–10, 1995.1. Information Processing & Management 35 (1): 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00028-4.

Harisyah, Harisyah, & Muhammad Azwar. 2015. Pemanfaatan Jurnal Elektronik oleh Mahasiswa Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Hasanuddin. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan & Informasi KHIZANAH AL-HIKMAH, 3 (June): 79–88. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v3i1a7.

Himawanto. 2016a. Produktivitas Penulis Indonesia di Riset Energi Internasional (Kajian Jurnal ScienceDirect). Khizanah Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, Informasi, dan Kearsipan, 4 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.24252/kah.v4i1a1.

Himawanto. 2016b. Performa Indonesia Pada Riset Konsorsium Energi: Asesmen Bibliometrik Jurnal Ilmiah Internasional. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 12 (2): 91–103. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.17287.

Himawanto. 2017. Profil Artikel Ilmiah Bidang Lingkungan di Indonesia: Analisis Bibliometrik. Lentera Pustaka, 3 (1): 27–41.

JPPN. 2017. Perguruan Tinggi Diminta Berhenti Langganan E-Jurnal. Akses di https://www.jpnn.com/news/perguruan-tinggi-diminta-berhenti-langganan-e-jurnal.

Maryatun & Pergola Irianti. 2016. Pemanfaatan Database EBSCO dan ProQuest Sebagai Rujukan Penyusunan Tesis dan Disertasi bagi Mahasiswa Program Magister Sains dan Doktor Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis UGM: Analisis Sitiran Jurnal Ilmiah. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 12 (2): 123–35.

Natakusumah, Engkos Koswara. 2016. Bibliometric Analysis of The Inkom Journal (Analisis Bibliometrik Jurnal INKOM). BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi. 36 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v36i1.199.

Nelisa, Malta. 2012. Produktivitas Pengarang Artikel Bidang Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi di Indonesia Tahun 1978-2007: Analisis Bibliometrika Menggunakan Hukum Lotka. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 30 (2): 73–95.

Rahayu, Sri & Abdul Rahman Saleh. 2017. Studi Bibliometrik dan Sebaran Topik Penelitian pada Jurnal Hayati Terbitan 2012-2016. Pustakaloka, 9 (2). https://doi.org/10.21154/pustakaloka.v9i2.1092.

Sánchez, Amador Durán, María de la Cruz Del Río Rama, & José Álvarez García. 2017. Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Wine Tourism in the Databases Scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23 (1): 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.02.001.

ScienceDirect. 2018. ScienceDirect. January 3. Di https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journals.

Scopus. 2017. Scopus Source List. Di http://www.scopus.com.

Subramanyam, K. 1983. Bibliometric Studies of Research Collaboration: A Review. Journal of Information Science, 6 (1): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555158300600105.

Sulistyo-Basuki. 2016. Dari Bibliometrika Hingga Informetrika. Media Pustakawan, 23: 7–14.

Tupan. 2017. Analisis Saintometrik Pertumbuhan Literatur Bidang Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi Berbasis Data Scopus Tahun 1996-2016. Lokakarya Nasional Dokumentasi dan Informasi. Jakarta: Pusat Dokumentasi dan Informasi Ilmiah - LIPI.

Saputra, Andi. 2018. Unand Peringkat 12 untuk Kategori PTN di Scopus. Perpustakaan Universitas Andalas. February 6. Di http://pustaka.unand.ac.id/berita-dan-peristiwa/item/170-peringkat-scopus.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v39i2.389



Copyright (c) 2018 BACA: JURNAL DOKUMENTASI DAN INFORMASI

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Gedung A PDII-LIPI, Jl. Jenderal Gatot Subroto No.10, Jakarta Selatan 12710
Copyright 2017 by PDII-LIPI, Design by Slamet Riyanto