In this article the author argues that the globalization and independent professionalization makes it imperative that archivists and arsiparis are engaged in a joint enterprise hence differ in the status of independence and the relationship within the government institution. This paper presents Participatory Action Research (PAR) which is an approach to research in communities that emphasizes participation and action. It seeks to understand the world by trying to change it, collaboratively and following reflection. Informants of seven record managers in Indonesia are the source of data on this research. In developing this argument, the common roots of archivist and arsiparis are examined its emergence of archives in Indonesia in the 1950s and their subsequent divergence over the next three decades. The author identifies the common ground that archivist and arsiparis share in dealing with recorded information. This common ground, which includes records integrity, archive provenance, and archive original order over time, is linked into a single unifying theme by the importance of the contextual relations. Arsiparis, record manager, and archivist are considered as two ways of managing document in organization under the same roof of governing government. The article concludes with a call for archivists and arsiparis to participate in the design of independence professionals, in order to ensure that archivists and arsiparis are acceptance within the competition of global market under the protection of independence professional association, and legitimized by the regulation of government under the constitution.

ARMA/American Records Manager Association International. 2007. Records and Information Management Core Competencies. Lenexa: ARMA.

Bettington, Jackie. 2008. Keeping Archives. Canberra: Australian Society of Archivists.

Chevalier, J.M. & Buckles, D.J. 2013. Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. London: Routledge.

Dollar, Charles M. 1993. Archivists and Records Managers in the Information Age. Archivaria, 21–30. At https://doi.org/loc?.

Gogolou, Christina, & Efi Dimopoulou. 2015. Land Administration Standardization for the Integration of Cultural Heritage in Land Use Policies. Land Use Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.029.

Greenwood, Royston, Roy Suddaby, & C. R. Hinings. 2002. Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069285.

Guillén, Mauro F. 2001. Is Globalization Civilizing, Destructive or Feeble? A Critique of Five Key Debates in the Social Science Literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 235–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.235.

Hatch, Mary Jo. 2006. Organization Theory. Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Leontjew, A. 1979. Tätigkeit Bewußtsein Persönlichkeit. Berlin.

Lewin, K. 1946. Action research and minority problems, in G.W. Lewin (Ed.) Resolving Social Conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.

McKemmish, Sue, Shannon Faulkhead, & Lynette Russell. 2011. Distrust in the Archive: Reconciling Records. Archival Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-011-9153-2.

O’Toole M. James & Cox J. Richard. 2008. Understanding Archives & Manuscripts. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.

Rahman, Md. A. 2012. Some Trends in the Praxis of Participatory Action Research. London: Sage.

Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. 2008. The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. California: Sage.

Tannenbaum, Arnold S. 1956. Control Structure and Union Functions. American Journal of Sociology 61, No.6, May, 536-545. https://doi.org/10.1086/221846.

Williams. 2013. Managing Electronic Records: Methods, Best Practices, and Technologies. New Jersey: Wiley.

Xiaomi, An. 2003. An Integrated Approach to Record Management. The Information Management Journal.