Slamet Riyanto, Ekawati Marlina, Hendro Subagyo, Hermin Triasih, Aris Yaman


High quality data and data quality assessment which efficiently needed to data standardization in the research data repository. Three attributes most used i.e: completeness, accuracy, and timeliness are dimensions to data quality assessment. The purposes of the research are to increase knowledge and discuss in depth of research done. To support the research, we are using traditional review method on the Scopus database to identify relevant research. The literature review is limited for the type of documents i.e: articles, books, proceedings, and reviews. The result of document searching is filtered using some keywords i.e: data quality, data quality assessment, data quality dimensions, quality assessment, data accuracy, dan data completeness. The document that found be analyzed based on relevant research. Then, these documents compare to find out different of concept and method which used in the data quality metric. The result of analysis could be used as a recommendation to implement in the data quality assessment in the National Scientific Repository.


Repository; Data; Quality; Data assessment; Research data management; Publication; Indonesia

Full Text:



Ashley, K. 2013. Data Quality and Quration. Data Science Journal, 12(10), 65–68.

Austin, C., Brown, S., Fong, N., Humphrey, C., Leahey, A., & Webster, P. 2015. Research Data Repositories: Review of Current Features, Gap Analysis, and Recommendations For Minimum Requirements.

Azeroual, O., Saake, G., & Wastl, J. 2018. Data Measurement in Research Information Systems: Metrics for The Evaluation of Data Quality. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1271–1290.

Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., & Maurino, A. 2009. Methodologies for Data Quality Assessment and Improvement. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–52.

Batini, C., & Scannapieco, M. 2016. Introduction to Information Quality. Data and Information Quality: Dimensions, Principles and Techniques.

Bovee, M., Srivastava, R. P., & Mak, B. 2003. A Conceptual Framework and Belief Function Approach to Assessing Overall Information Quality. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information Quality, 18, 311–328.

Cai, L., & Zhu, Y. 2015. The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. Data Science Journal, 14.

Carey, M. J., & Ceri, S. 2006. Data-Centric Systems and Applications Data, 49. Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Chen, H., Hailey, D., Wang, N., & Yu, P. 2014. A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(5), 5170–5207.

Federer, L. 2016. Research Data Management in The Age of Big Data: Roles and Opportunities for Librarians. Information Services and Use, 36(1–2), 35–43.

Gebauer, M., & Windheuser. 2017. Structured Data Analysis, Profiling, and Business Rules. Germany: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Heinrich, B., Hristova, D., Klier, M., Schiller, A., & Szubartowicz, M. 2018. Requirements for Data Quality Metrics. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 9(2), 1–32.

Izham, J.M., Sidi, F., Ishak, I., Suriani, A.L., & Jabar, A. M. 2017. A Review of Data Quality Research in Achieving High Data Quality Within Organization. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 95(12), 2647–2657.

Kindling, M., Pampel, H., Van de Sandt, S., Rücknagel, J., Vierkant, P., Kloska, G., … Scholze, F. 2017. The Landscape of Research Data Repositories in 2015: A Ee3data analysis. D-Lib Magazine, 23(3–4).

Martin, M. 2005. Measuring and Improving Data Quality. Part II: Measuring data quality. NAHSS Outlook.

McGilvray, D. 2008. Executing Data Quality Projects. Executing Data Quality Projects, 256–277.

Pampel, H., Vierkant, P., Scholze, F., Bertelmann, R., Kindling, M., Klump, J., … Dierolf, U. 2013. Making Research Data Repositories Visible: The Registry. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e78080.

Peer, L., Green, A., & Stephenson, E. 2014. Committing to Data Quality Review. In The 9th International Digital Curation Conference.

Shariat, P.P. H., Sidi, F., Affendey, L. S., Jabar, M. A., Ibrahim, H., &

Mustapha, A. 2013. A Framework to Construct Data Quality Dimensions Relationships. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 6(5), 4422–4431.

Spier, S., Gundlach, J., Pampel, H., Kindling, M., Kirchhoff, A., Klump, J., … Scholze, F. 2012. Vocabulary for the Registration and Description of Research Data Repositories. Version 2.0.

Wang, R. Y., Storey, V. C., & Firth, C. P. 1995. A Framework for Analysis of Data Quality Research. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 7(4), 623–640.

Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. 1996a. Anchoring Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations. Communications of the ACM, 39(11), 86–95.

Wang, R. Y., & Strong, D. M. 1996b. Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 5–33.

Xiao, Y., Lu, L. Y. Y., Liu, J. S., & Zhou, Z. 2014. Knowledge Diffusion Path Analysis of Data Quality Literature: A Main Path Analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 594–605.

Yoon, A., & Kim, Y. 2017. Social scientists’ data reuse behaviors: Exploring the roles of attitudinal beliefs, attitudes, norms, and data repositories. Library and Information Science Research, 39(3), 224–233.

Zhu, H., & Wu, H. 2014. Assessing The Quality of Large-Scale Data Standards: A Case of XBRL GAAP Taxonomy. Decision Support Systems, 59(1), 351–360.



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Jl. Jend.Gatot Subroto No.10, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta12710, Indonesia
Copyright 2019 by PDDI LIPI, Design by Slamet Riyanto