Email this article 
EVALUASI KINERJA LAYANAN PERPUSTAKAAN UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA BERBASIS STANDAR NASIONAL DAN INTERNASIONAL
Abstract
The performance of the university library must always be evaluated and assessed. Assessment or evaluation activities usually have to use standard measuring tools, so that the results can be accounted for. The results of the evaluation carried out correctly can be used as a reference and basis for library development in the future. This research is an evaluated study of the library service performance evaluation of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya (UINSA). The standards used as evaluation tools are the National Standards for College Libraries (SNP 13 of 2017) and the Standards for libraries in higher education issued by the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), a division of the American Library Association (ALA). 2018. Using both instruments of national and international standards, the researcher wants to know the level of achievement of UINSA's library service performance from these two levels. This study uses the collecting data methods, namely documentation, questionnaires, and observations. Documentation is used to evaluate performance based on SNP 13 in 2017 while a questionnaire is used to evaluate performance based on the Standard for libraries in higher education. Documentation guide using the university library accreditation instrument. Meanwhile, the questionnaire was compiled based on the performance indicators of the 3 (three) principles of Standard for libraries in higher education, namely Professional Values, Education role, and Discovery. The results showed that the performance of UINSA Library services based on SNP 13 of 2017 had reached the standard, with a value of 4.6. The Evaluation based on the Standard for libraries in higher education, it also exceeds the standard with a value of 4.2. The results of this study became the basis for the preparation of a long-term library development policy document as part of the quality manual document. A document that will form the basis of library development for the next 5 years.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Agustiawan. (2019). Evaluasi kinerja UPT Perpustakaan ISI Yogyakarta berdasarkan Peraturan Perpustakaan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 10 Tahun 2018 Tentang Instrumen Akreditasi Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi. http://lib.isi.ac.id
Antasari, I. W. (2017). Analisis layanan perpustakaan IAIN Purwokerto menurut Standar Akreditasi Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi. LIBRARIA: Jurnal Perpustakaan, 4(2), 395. https://doi.org/10.21043/LIBRARIA.V4I2.1712
Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL), A. (2018). Standards for libraries in higher education. In Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/standardslibraries
Devani, V. (2016). Pengukuran kinerja perpustakaan dengan pendekatan balanced scorecard. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 15(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.23917/JITI.V15I1.1505
Fatmawati, E. (2012). Evaluasi kualitas layanan Perpustakaan FEB UNDIP berdasarkan harapan dan persepsi pemustaka dengan metode LibQUAL. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.22146/BIP.7725
Fatmawati, E. (2013). Mata baru penelitian perpustakaan dari SERVQUAL ke LibQUAL. Sagung Seto.
Hermawan, A., Kristiasari, A., NBhiju, F., & Manik, D. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi kinerja pada Perpustakaan Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana Salatiga. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 16(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22146/BIP.V16I1.61
Indonesia. (2017). Perka_13_2017_SNP_Perpustakaan_Perguruan_Tinggi.pdf. Perpustakaan Nasional RI. files/82/Perka_13_2017_SNP_Perpustakaan_Perguruan_Tinggi.pdf
Indonesia. (2018). Perka_Nomor_10_Tahun_2018_tentang_Instrumen_Akreditasi_Perpustakaan_Perguruan_Tinggi.pdf. Perpustakaan Nasional RI. files/83/Perka_Nomor_10_Tahun_2018_tentang_Instrumen_Akreditasi_Perpustakaan_Perguruan_Tinggi.pdf
Irianingsih, I., Nahar, J., & Larasati, R. (2016). Aplikasi model persamaan struktural dalam analisis pengaruh kualitas pelayanan ( LibQUAL+®) terhadap kepuasan dan loyalitas pemustaka. Jurnal Matematika Integratif, 12(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmi.v12.n1.10280.19-26
Khotimah, K. (2017). Eksistensi pustakawan dalam meningkatkan kualitas perpustakaan perguruan tinggi melalui akreditasi perpustakaan. LIBRARIA: Jurnal Perpustakaan, 4(2), 333–364. https://doi.org/10.21043/LIBRARIA.V4I2.1715
Kumar, A., & Mahajan, P. (2019). Evaluating library service quality of University of Kashmir: a LibQUAL+ survey. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 20(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-09-2018-0024/FULL/XML
Nurohman, A. (2017). Pengelolaan perpustakaan perguruan tinggi berbasis akreditasi. LIBRARIA: Jurnal Perpustakaan, 4(2), 419–448. https://doi.org/10.21043/LIBRARIA.V4I2.1711
Oktaviela, T. A. (2016). Persepsi pemustaka terhadap kualitas layanan window of the world (WOW) Perpustakaan UGM berdasarkan model LibQUAL+TM. Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 12(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.13054
Perpustakaan Nasional RI, I. (2019). Standar Nasional Perpustakaan Provinsi, Kab / Kota, Kecamatan, Desa / Kelurahan.
Purnomowati, S. (2012). Mengukur kinerja perpustakaan. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 25(3–4), 61–67. http://jurnalbaca.pdii.lipi.go.id/index.php/baca/article/view/83
Rahayuningsih, F. (2015). Mengukur kepuasan pemustaka menggunakan metode LibQUAL+TM. Graha Ilmu.
Ramezani, A., Ghazimirsaeed, S. J., Azadeh, F., Bandboni, M. E., & YektaKooshali, M. H. (2018). A meta-analysis of service quality of Iranian university libraries based on the LibQUAL model. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 19(3), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-05-2017-0014/FULL/XML
Saleh, A. R. (2013). Indikator kinerja perpustakaan menurut ISO 11620: 2008 (Information and Documentation – Library Perfomance Indicators) bagian pertama dari dua tulisan. Media Pustaka, 20(2), 9. https://digilib.undip.ac.id/v2/2016/04/21/indikator-kinerja-perpustakaan-menurut-iso-11620-2008-information-and-documentation-library-perfomance-indicators-bagian-pertama-dari-dua-tulisan/
Sinambela, L. P. (2014). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif: untuk bidang administrasi, kebijakan publik, ekonomi, sosiologi, komunikasi dan ilmu sosial lainnya. Graha Ilmu. files/185/7412-28794-1-PB.pdf
Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Alfabeta. http://catalog.uinsby.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=96217&keywords=metode+penelitian+kombinasi
Wibawanti, Y. (2015). Model pengukuran kinerja Perpustakaan PTS X berdasarkan ISO 11620:2008 dan SNP 010:201. Faktor Exacta, 8(4), 369–380. files/70/Wibawanti - 2015 - MODEL PENGUKURAN KINERJA PERPUSTAKAAN PTS X BERDASARKAN ISO 11620:2008 DAN SNP 010:2011.pdf
Wu, C. H., Yuan, Y. H., & Tsai, S. B. (2020). Using the DEMATEL model to expose core causal items of LibQUAL for improving library service quality: from the perspective of big data. Soft Computing, 24(8), 5729–5739. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00500-019-04308-5
Yaniasih, Y., Tupan, T., Yoganingrum, A., & Rachmawati, R. (2016). Kinerja Perpustakaan PDII-LIPI Serpong berdasarkan indeks kepuasan pengguna, ranking aspek layanan, dan perbandingan dengan lembaga sejenis. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 37(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.14203/JURNALBACA.V37I2.237
Zhang, Y. L., Bi, R. F., & Xiao, M. (2017). Studying on enhancing readers’ satisfaction model of electronic service quality in library based on LibQUAL+ and Kano. Procedia Engineering, 174, 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2017.01.132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v43i1.856
Data citation
Rodliyah, Ummi, 2022, "Evaluasi Kinerja Layanan Perpustakaan UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya berbasis Instrumen Akreditasi Perpustakaan dan Standards for Libraries in higher education", https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12690/RIN/VMU9D5, RIN Dataverse, DRAFT VERSION
Copyright (c) 2022 BACA: JURNAL DOKUMENTASI DAN INFORMASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
