Email this article 
PEMILIHAN PERANGKAT LUNAK REPOSITORI INSTITUSI PERPUSTAKAAN PERGURUAN TINGGI DI KOTA MALANG (STUDI KASUS DI PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS BRAWIJAYA, PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MALANG, DAN PERPUSTAKAAN UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MALANG)
Abstract
The purposes of this research are to know, describe, and analyze institutional repository softwares selection in Universitas Brawijaya (UB) Library, State University of Malang (UM) Library, and University of Muhammadiyah Malang (UMM) Library, also comparing software features of institutional repository.This research is using multi-site case study method with qualitative approach. Data was collected by observation, interviews, use of documents and audio-visual material. The results of this research indicate that the selection of software in academic library needs to pay attention to four aspects of software selection: (1) as needed; (2) have a licence; (3) technical support, training, relevant documentation and maintenance; (4) staff responsible for the selection and evaluation of digital collection software and related services to meet user or community needs. The selection of institutional repository software is not appropriate, resulting in the UB Library to migrate data from BKG to Eprints and UMM Library to migrate manually from GDL to Eprints. Academic library needs to pay attention to right aspects of software selection in building and developing institutional repositories and features.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ALA. 2009. Academic Libraries. Di http://www.ala.org/tools/research/librarystats/academic.
Arnomo, I. 2018. Perbandingan Perangkat Lunak Repository Institusi: Studi Kasus pada Repository Institusi di Indonesia. INFORM: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, Vol.3,No.1.
Creswell, John W. 2016. Research Design:Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Translated by Achmad Fawaid and Rianayati Kusmini Pancasari. 4thed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
David, Anthony & Giordano. 2015. Performing Information Governance: A Step-by-Step Guide to Making Information Governance Work. United Stated: IBM Press Pearson Plc.
Das, Amiya Kumar. 2015. Comparing Open Source Digital Library Software: Special Reference to DSpace, EPrint, and Greenstone. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, Vol.5, No.7.
Franks, Patricia C. 2013. Records and Information Management. London: Facet Publishing.
Hendrawan, Muhammad Rosyihan & Mochamad Chazienul Ulum. 2017. Pengantar Kearsipan: dari Isu Kebijakan ke Manajemen. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Hendrawan, Muhammad Rosyihan. 2016. Penerapan Knowledge Management pada The United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Record and Library Journal, 2(1).
Hendrawan, Muhammad Rosyihan. 2014. Model Interoperabilitas Teknis pada Aplikasi Perpustakaan Digital LARAS Versi 1.0: Studi Kasus di PDII-LIPI. Visi Pustaka, 16(1).
IFLA. 2014. IFLA/UNESCO Manifesto for Digital Libraries. Manifesto Endorsed by the 36th Session of the General Conferences of UNESCO, 1–4. Di http://www.ifla.org/files/digital-libraries/documents/ifla-unesco-digital-libraries-manifesto.pdf.
Jeelani, Sofi Gh Mohiuddin, Haamid Amin Mir, & Basharat Ahmad Wani. 2016. Institutional Repositories in India: An Evaluative Study. International Interdisciplinary Research Journal (IJLIS), 5 (3):166–84.
Kaur, Harpreet. 2017. Managing Institutional Repositories in India: Benefits and Challenges. International Journal of Management and Applied Science (IJMAS), 3(10).
Lynch, C. A. 2003. Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Scholarship in the Digital Age. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2). Di http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/br/br226/br226ir.shtml.
OpenDOAR. 2018. Search or Browse for Repositories-Indonesia-Table-All perPage. Di http://www.opendoar.org/find.php.
Pendit, Putu Laxman. 2007. Perpustakaan Digital: Perspektif Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Sagung Seto.
Pendit, Putu Laxman. 2008. Perpustakaan Digital Dari A Sampai Z. Jakarta: Citra Karyakarsa Mandiri.
Pendit, Putu Laxman. 2017. Tradisi Pustaka dan Profesi Pustakawan dalam Konteks Pengembangan Bangsa dan Tatakelola Informasi, 1–18.
Randhawa, Sukhwinder. 2008. Open Source Software and Libraries. Trends and Strategic Issues for Libraries in Global Information Society, 369–77. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJLIS12.038.
Rubin, Richard E. 2016. Foundations of Library and Information Science. USA: American Library Association.
Sterman, Leila. 2014. Institutional Repositories: An Analysis of Trends and a Proposed Collaborative Future. College and Undergraduate Libraries, 21(3–4), 360–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2014.943919.
Sun, Jie, & Bao-Zhong Yuan. 2012. Development and Characteristic of Digital Library as a Library Branch. IERI Procedia, 2:12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2012.06.044.
Supriyanto, W., & A.Muhsin. 2008. Teknologi Informasi Perpustakaan:Strategi Perancangan Perpustakaan Digital. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Vimal Kumar, V. 2007. Selection and Management of Open Source Software in Libraries. Conference paper in CALIBER 2007, 8-10 February, Chandigarh (India).
Witten, I. H., & David Nicholas David M. Bainbridge. 2010. How to Build a Digital Library. USA: Elsevier, Inc.
Xie, I & K. K.Matusiak. 2016. Discover Digital Libraries: Theory and Practice. Discover Digital Libraries: Theory and Practice. Di https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85016877854&partnerID=40&md5=1ebe400fdca77bf1decb8437e2163a89.
Yanto. 2016. Pengelolaan Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi Berbasis Konsep Institutional Repository. TAMADDUN, 16 (1):136–57.
Yusup, Pawit M. 2016. Ilmu Informasi, Komunikasi, Dan Kepustakaan. 2nded. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v39i2.432
Copyright (c) 2018 BACA: JURNAL DOKUMENTASI DAN INFORMASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
